The boss-employee relationship is defunct. Managers think young workers aren’t willing to pay dues, but really young workers aren’t willing to be employees. Managers dangle the lure of a raise or a title, but young workers just want to build something together as a team.
The new org chart shouldn’t be based on hierarchy then, but a horizontal ladder of peer-to-peer management, where employee and boss teach and learn from each other. They share, knowledge, experience and ideas.
Working together in service to a larger vision is a more human way of employment, but it is antithetical to how businesses currently run. A business is successful – no matter what it’s product, salsa or insurance – because it can replicate a system to make that salsa, distribute the salsa and find customers to buy the salsa over and over again. The 5,674th jar of salsa has the same chance at delighting a customer and turning a profit as the first.
Start-ups call this the secret sauce.
That’s why many people love working at start-ups so much (and why many people don’t). At a large company, you advance your career not on the originality of your own ideas, but because you can showcase increasing familiarity and understanding of the company’s secret sauce. You’re the company man.
At a start-up, particularly in the beginning, all ideas are equal. The secret sauce is unknown. It’s a mystery. The mode of work is to test, experiment and recycle constantly. Will it work to do it this way? How about this way? It is a puzzle, an unfinished essay, half of a log cabin. The end result is only known as something great in the mind’s vision. A large company buys a start-up because the start-up figured out the replicable system.
When a company finds the secret sauce, it is institutionalized because it works. A hierarchy is put in place to ensure it continues to work and that no one deviates from the system, because that would put the company’s success at risk.
Originality is siloed into its own department, but companies do have to keep pace with innovation, so orders to add to or subtract from the secret sauce are handed down from those who are most familiar with the company’s system, typically upper-management.
You usually have to advance through a company’s hierarchy to change the system, because factory workers don’t have their own widget factories to experiment with, for instance. In order to know all there is about creating a widget you have to continue to be promoted. Hierarchy makes sense.
But wait, we don’t make widgets in the knowledge economy.
The Internet gives everyone connected to it the same opportunity to experiment on the same platform, whether you’re a company or individual. Now low-level employees have front-level, do-it-yourself access to the tools that create the systems and sauce on a scale more omnipresent than ever before.
A blog is an experiment. How do you bring in consistent subscribers? Does commenting on other blogs work? What about guest-posting? Does emailing other bloggers work? Should you build relationships with Blogger A or Blogger B? Why? What is quality content? How do you write it? Does it matter?
An Etsy shop is a test. What headlines work? Does it matter how the crocheted plastic bag holder is photographed? Where do you advertise your products? Google? Facebook ads? What is good SEO? Which color is better? What is the customer’s feedback? Which shipping method is cheapest and fastest? Does including a personal note give you a better rating?
Expertise is no longer institutionally created, but self-made. And it is no longer systematized but shared in the open for the rest of the web to adapt, change and build upon.
There is no need for hierarchy. Decision makers, yes. Titles and responsibilities, yes. But hierarchy, no. Leadership is now inclusive and collaborative.
Fare thee well, boss. It was nice to know you.
16 replies on “Fare Thee Well, Boss”
I really loved this post Rebecca. I have yet to work at a start-up per se, but a lot of your insight about start-ups (share knowledge, experience and ideas) reminds me of my own industry: advertising. Specifically advertising agencies where we sell ideas to current clients and try to pitch to new clients on a regular basis. Sometimes we win accounts, sometimes we loose accounts. But, the process is recycled and good shops know the “secret sauce”. The only difference is, that most clients/brands won’t stay at the same agency over a long period of time. Also, even though there are independent ad agencies, most are owned by large communication conglomerates.
I’m curious where do see ad agencies fit in how business run today? Do you think they are the epitome of the standard “business” model, “start-up” model or somewhere in between?
Again, great post Rebecca!
That’s so funny, Andrea, when I was writing this I was thinking about creative and ad agencies as well as another example where there are titles, but probably less of a hierarchy because you need collaboration (the ability to bounce ideas off each other) to win accounts and come up with winning campaigns. You’re always trying to figure out what will work. That’s how I imagine them running at least. I wouldn’t call it a start-up model (I’m just most familiar with that), but perhaps a scientific process or design process? It’s interesting how much the knowledge economy has allowed us to focus on more creative and high-fashioned pursuits. We don’t need to scour for food, so we can express ourselves instead… I’m really interested in how that will play out in the workplace and how innovation occurs. Thanks for the comment!
Boomers are still in the “caste” system at work. I’ve had bosses ask for input, then literally slice and dice the person making the suggestion. If the boss likes you, he/she will listen. If the boss doesn’t like you, he/she works very hard to belittle the suggestion. But, no ideas will be incorporated unless the boss can make it his/hers to keep and exert the power and keep the hierarcy in place. I’m happy to hear that younger workers are having a different work experience. It is truly better for everyone and may even garner the illusive loyalty that employers are complaing they don’t get from the younger generation. This is a very thought provoking post for any age group. Thank you for views. It gives me faith in the future.
Love this comment. At the bottom line, it definitely is about making who you work with like you and making your boss (or team members) look good. Thanks for the synopsis!
” If the boss likes you, he/she will listen. If the boss doesn’t like you, he/she works very hard to belittle the suggestion.” << I've worked for that person. IT WAS HARD. I much prefer the everyone's ideas are equal or at least considered game.
I think everything in this post is generally right on. In my startup we are struggling with one individual who came to us with a little ball of expertise and is set on doing just that. Responsibilities in a startup are much more broad and if the group doesn’t conform to the decision maker’s decisions on broad responsibilities then the relationships won’t work. I’m referring to early early stage i.e. 3/4 people. So when you have one person intent on doing a small piece, things are inequitable they are still 1/3rd or 1/4th of the manpower. Everyone does everything in a startup. I’m not sure exactly how these points fit in to your post of doing away with hierarchy :) but food for thought! in a startup are much more broad and if the group doesn’t conform to the decision maker’s decisions on broad responsibilities then the relationships won’t work. I’m referring to early early stage i.e. 3/4 people. So when you have one person intent on doing a small piece, things are inequitable they are still 1/3rd or 1/4th of the manpower. Everyone does everything in a startup. I’m not sure exactly how these points fit in to your post of doing away with hierarchy :) but food for thought!
I think everything in this post is generally right on. In my startup we are struggling with one individual who came to us with a little ball of expertise and is set on doing just that. Responsibilities in a startup are much more broad and if the group doesn’t conform to the decision maker’s decisions on broad responsibilities then the relationships won’t work. I’m referring to early early stage i.e. 3/4 people. So when you have one person intent on doing a small piece, things are inequitable they are still 1/3rd or 1/4th of the manpower. Everyone does everything in a startup. I’m not sure exactly how these points fit in to your post of doing away with hierarchy :) but food for thought! in a startup are much more broad and if the group doesn’t conform to the decision maker’s decisions on broad responsibilities then the relationships won’t work. I’m referring to early early stage i.e. 3/4 people. So when you have one person intent on doing a small piece, things are inequitable they are still 1/3rd or 1/4th of the manpower. Everyone does everything in a startup. I’m not sure exactly how these points fit in to your post of doing away with hierarchy :) but food for thought!
I think everything in this post is generally right on. In my startup we are struggling with one individual who came to us with a little ball of expertise and is set on doing just that. Responsibilities in a startup are much more broad and if the group doesn’t conform to the decision maker’s decisions on broad responsibilities then the relationships won’t work. I’m referring to early early stage i.e. 3/4 people. So when you have one person intent on doing a small piece, things are inequitable they are still 1/3rd or 1/4th of the manpower. Everyone does everything in a startup. I’m not sure exactly how these points fit in to your post of doing away with hierarchy :) but food for thought! in a startup are much more broad and if the group doesn’t conform to the decision maker’s decisions on broad responsibilities then the relationships won’t work. I’m referring to early early stage i.e. 3/4 people. So when you have one person intent on doing a small piece, things are inequitable they are still 1/3rd or 1/4th of the manpower. Everyone does everything in a startup. I’m not sure exactly how these points fit in to your post of doing away with hierarchy :) but food for thought!
That comment was supposed to end at “foof for thought!”
That comment was supposed to end at “foof for thought!”
FOOD not foof………… jeez what is wrong with me?? what is wrong with me??
That comment was supposed to end at “foof for thought!”
Thanks for sharing this story, Patrick! Love it. I think everyone doing everything is very indicative of a horizontal leadership structure and definitely the early stages of a company. That’s what most people love about start-ups is that particular time – so hard, but oh so good too :)
I think that most people under 35 would agree with this post. But people above that age tend to play under other rules, it’s just a generation gap about work values. In the same direction as this article I would like to add this interview
http://academy.justjobs.com/dont-suck-at-your-job/ which I found quite informative.
[…] ambition. Their elders are already bemoaning Gen Z’s lack of ambition, but that is really their dis-enthrallment with traditional power structures and control. Gen Z is growing up in a world where the old power structures have already fallen […]
[…] the value of the team We are a collaborative generation, and we can produce better results as a team than as individuals working together. However, we also know that you must contribute. No one gets a […]